S: Hi, I appreciate that you find the time to talk to me and answer some of my questions. I would like to know you are your opinion about the situation with coronavirus. There are more topics which are interesting to me. The first question is: Do you think that the virus is really that dangerous as it is claimed and if you feel that measurements are really helpful and reasonable?
D: What has claimed about this virus? So that’s the first thing to do. Let me just start off by saying this. Our culture in our history has been created on belief. Our religion says: “You are right when you believe what we tell you”. This is a belief. The more you believe, the more right you are. So, if people have their opinions, they go strongly for what they believe. And I want to get rid of belief. I wanna go to trivium. Do you know what I mean with the trivium?
S: Yes, I have an idea. That is grammar, logic and rhetoric.
D: In science, we always have to be consistent with the trivium. What happens with the trivium if you look for logical fallacies? And as people are in philosophy or in science, you look for logical fallacies. And if it is a logical fallacy you can’t move into rhetoric. Trivium starts with the grammar which is just the facts and the logic how those fact are arranged. When there is a logical fallacy, you can’t move further.
Statistics and science, they are masters at using statistics to obfuscate things, to make them to something different than what it is. And that is not an opinion, people write books about that. People teach that in courses. There is a way how to use statistics which create a logical fallacy, but unless you are aware of critical thinking of the trivium the scientific method that wouldn’t make sense to me. We have to find a way to make sure if it is there any logical fallacy. People can use the statistics to lie. Videos are always about interpretation. Yes, we need to take care about how people use the data.
S: Yes, it is right. But you haven’t answered my first question yet. What do you think about the virus?
D: I am getting there. I have said the context of my opinion because I have to say, the context for my opinion.
We are gonna go to trivium to the very basic fact about a virus I want to use the criteria of science how science is consistent of itself.
S: Well, and do you know some data about the virus, the real data and where you take them.
D: Yes, I know, from the science from the basics, from the scientific method itself. Koch’s postulate1.
S: And do you know the real data, how many people were tested and how many people were contracted?
D: We didn’t get there. You are going too far too fast, that is what people do. Our culture trains us to go to rhetoric. Go to the store, I am going back to the store, back to the beginning. We have to go further back.
S: Ok, and what is the beginning at this point?
D: That is what I told you Koch’s postulate. That is the foundation of science. That is the grammar.
S: Well, but if you want to work with the grammar, you need the same data to work with them.
M: Not yet. You’re going too fast too far. You can’t get data if you gonna use the false information. If you gonna start with an assumption that doesn’t satisfy what science shows.
S: But you keep talking about things only in general without anything concrete. What is your matter for thinking? If you have the rules because of the trivium, If you have rules, you need something which you can use as an object. Where do you take the basics how to think about the topic on its own?
D: Koch’s postulate. I have my tools on how to say we have to satisfy the certain criteria that are the virus.
You see, you are going to the rhetoric again. You want to go to rhetoric with no grammar yet. We still don’t have grammar at all yet, and you are gonna talk about rhetoric. We have to stay with grammar for now. We have to establish some grammar for now. Because when I go to the rhetoric and I say things that everybody can disagree and it is gonna be right. Because there are no rules, so we don’t have any standard. You are seeking to how people can suck cripple information.
We have to stay away from rhetoric. And we can really get the good grounding on the grammar otherwise we have a Hegelian dialectic. That is the absolute great hammers which people have using for years. They have this: “There is a problem, and there is a solution”. They bam the ball, and there is no grammar; then it is still the rhetoric.
Now people seek for a ridiculous solution. That is why there are only two political parties in the system because they just want to peak both sides. We need to get a lot of time to get even to logic. We can get to the rhetoric, but now, you and I, we have to stay with the grammar.
S: I know it is not that simple, but they need to do something. They need to take some stance if they are politicians. Maybe you see the details which I do not.
D: That is right, I see the details which people don’t see. I have gone over the rhetoric over and over and over and I have done that. I had many discussions which don’t have no points because we didn’t stay with the grammar. We need to stay with the grammar. I see it with the nutrition. People say just something and I can believe it because it came from somebody. And those somebodies seem like people ho know stuff. Here is an example what we have done, the low fat diets prevents heart disease. It is common knowledge. Isn’t it?
S: Not really. There are a lot of studies which say the opposite.
D: But twenty-thirty years ago, it was pretty much a gospel of every cardiologist or doctor. Right? Where did that narrative come from?
S: Maybe from someone who did the first study about it.
D: Yes. Ancel Keys2. So, here is the story, this is the perfect kind of story to understand the way we have been knowing. I am talking about everything.
The companies that sold vegetable oil and cottonseed oil, they want to make more money. That cottonseed oil was a waste product that they just had to find a way how to get rid of it because it is toxic. They said let’s tell people that the lard is not healthy and cottonseed oil is a heart-protecting thing. So, they hired a guy Ancel Keys. And he studied heart disease in 22 countries, and then he published his research. And this is an important story to understand the process. He was hired by business people to do some research. So, he did the research, and he published the research, and there is the perfect graph with a low-fat diet, no heart disease, high fat, high rate of heart disease. This culture more fat more disease, this culture…4, 5, 6. A perfect graph. So, then, he published that, and they send it to the doctors, the doctors said to the people, and they also send It to the media, and they also told it to the people. And in the sixties high fat diet caused heart disease and special saturated fat and vegetable oil prevents heart disease, so they started to do margarin.
And people start looking at this, and this is the part of the story, and this is what is going right now. So, other people, they didn’t have a lot of money, but they knew the science, they look back, and they said: “Ancel there are 6 countries and you studied 22. What do you call that? That’s called flaw (crap). So, this is how statistics lie. So, now, people looked back to all 22 countries and there is no correlation. So, now 50 years later doctors will still using that data and they are even educated to know that they were using the bad data that have been disproven so many times. Then people say you use the “margarin” which is it is the poison, it is a transfat. But you see because of money that didn’t get to the people that we thought would be educated in health. Even though we show that margarin is a poison, vegetable oil is a poison even 50 years later, The American Heart Association is still promoting a low-fat diet with vegetable oil which is not healthy.
This is what I am saying, doctors, media and people who have a voice, they should go back to the trivium. What are the facts? The facts are that six countries instead of 22. So, what is the grammar in this? The grammar is: How many countries did you use?
S: You are talking about the common trouble in science. Scientists are usually quite humble people, and they publish their finding very carefully. They are trained to claim their findings very carefully. But other people can take their conclusions and publish them ascertain.
D: I am gonna encourage you to read Molecules of Emotion, Candace Pert3.
We think that scientist are humble people, but other people mess them up, but it is a cruel, crooked business. The scientists are just human beings. There are spectacular people, and there are people they are criminals. It is just like everybody.
S: Ok, they are just people, it is perfectly fine. But if they publish their findings, they always hedge their statements. They never say that something is for 100% sure in any conditions.
D: I am not gonna agree with that. If they say it correctly, they are gonna say more like this. We found this outcome with this parameter. And if you look at this parameter if this is statistically significant or not. The reason why you are saying that is because you do studies. You have to do things in such manner that you satisfy the version the scientific method which is a version to get a paper a peer review, there has to be so much manner it has to be so precise. So, what they say, it is statistically significant, or it is not.
S: They always have to define the conditions when the findings are valid. That is what creates the credibility for science, and it makes trust. But people never read the studies.
They are too many studies, too many papers even you don’t have access to all of them. So, you need to find a way how to process all the information in the studies. I want to know the practical way how do you do it. You can’t deny all the science, and you can not say that everything is true. I am curious about your strategy in this process.
D: In the trivium, you get grammar logic and rhetoric, but if you want to find the opinion, you have to go back to the grammar. Where is the opinion there is believe satisfied the grammar?
This is your scientific method. I am just using the trivium, it is the scientific method, and it is just the way where I go. It is work to be able to learn this stuff. It takes work. I did do this for over 40 years. I was doing it just generically, studying philosophy. People talk about it all the time, they say: “My philosophy”, but wait a minute, stop. What is the difference between opinion, belief, hypothesis and philosophy? We just use words like whatever. Where is the difference, you know?
S: I have some idea what these words mean.
D: Yes, that is right, you have some idea, and most people have, and then they continue to have a conversation on somebody, they misuse all of those, they didn’t go back to the grammar. Now, we have a Hegelian dialectic4 again. It takes time, we have to work on all parts of this. In philosophy, they say: I can’t deny that. So, I will hold up to be true right now. That is what the true sceptic is. People say I don’t believe that. I am a sceptic. But it is not a sceptic. A sceptic Is a person like this: Nobody knows everything. I have got the way to believe anything. But I am a sceptic and now if somebody shows me some convincing information that go against my belief, then I go: Since I am sceptic I say thank you. I can’t deny that so I am gonna change my belief.
D: I give you my very favourite example of a sceptic. There is a quantum physicist named Elisabeth Rauscher5. She was a world-famous quantum physicist. She had patents and remarkable things. She started with remote viewing. She couldn’t believe it because she was a physicist, but other quantum physicist showed her the science behind it. She spent a few days studying the actual science, the grammar and she said I am a sceptic. So she spent three sleepless nights because as a sceptic she knew she couldn’t deny the science. She had to change her mind. That is a sceptic. But in our culture is a sceptic, a person who doesn’t change anything. They just use that word inappropriate. This is part of knowing how to know. We have to be careful because people throw this stuff up. They use it to obfuscate information.
D: Here is another one. You are a conspiracy theorist. There are two logical fallacies in one. First is “ad hominem” which means if you are in this category, it doesn’t matter what you say then you are we are gonna say, you are the part of this group and anything that you say, that we have to do what. That is a logical fallacy. You can be part of that group, or you are just Christian, so you wouldn’t know science. That is the logical fallacy, the first one. Conspiracy theory, what is the conspiracy theorist you know?
S: Yes, I know the meaning, which is this expression usually used.
D: Ok, We all have to be very careful. Listen carefully to this. That is media giving you wrong information. That is not what the conspiracy theory is. Listen carefully, I am gonna breath in, I inspire that is what we call inspiration. Now, I breathe out, I expire and now let’s do it together. Breath in and breath out, and now we have a conspiracy. It means that people breath together. Every day in my office I conspire. I make the people aware, that is what conspire means. Listen, people conspire all the time.
When Kennedy was shot, he was shot by a gay next to him. And people started asking how he could be shot by the guy next to him when he was shot from the front. And media said: don’t listen to the conspiracy theorist. But they were just the people who used grammar, and they asked. They were just trying to figure it out. These are people who are going back to grammar. These are just people they can get back to the grammar when they see the paper or the picture, and they ask.
How do you know this stuff? I can not tell you my opinion because we still have too many things to talk about. I can give you some sense how much I have learned how to know because what I know can make any difference until we spent a lot of time getting a giant picture about how I think.
D: It is a political thing, just last time, and then we move away. But this is important, this is how I know things. Where I get my information. What happened about politics. There is a republican or democrat or whatever they say an anarchist. What is anarchy?
S: These are people who don’t want rules.
D: Yes, but it is not exactly right. The prefix “a-” means against. I am atypical, that is I am against typical. What is the anarchy. I don’t wanna be ruled. Anarchist is not the person who doesn’t want order. This person just doesn’t wanna be ruled.
S: You can use the expression in a different meaning, you just need to agree with the definition.
D: Than you are gonna use the language which is common, but it is not correct. So, I am a conspiracy theorist and if you are not, let’s start being one.
Get groups because we want to conspire to teach to learn how to make the world better. But we don’t get these keywords.
D: And let me tell you something, you and I both know that media is controlled with people with PhDs, they know how to use those words, and if I don’t learn I can’t know what’s going on right now. But if I say, ok I did learn language science and lots of parts of it, I studied biochemistry, I studied statistics, I studied a lot of stuff, anatomy, I studied nutrition. So I get to go for all of those things. So, if I start talking, I want everybody to be aware of how we go straight to rhetoric.
D: Your question is: how do we know…
Well, we need to be aware we are taught going to the rhetoric, being aware of that is the worst thing because our culture is telling us we need to believe, first. Our school system doesn’t teach this way of thinking at all. You can imagine that I can go to the history of that and to primary sources. And it seems pretty clear that there is a constant infusion to teach people what to think and not how to think. All we teach them what to think. Right now, we all understand what is going on there. We have to be aware that the media support the system on what to believe. People with the most money just like Ancel Keys these are the ones who blasted, blasted, blasted. If you tell somebody a lie, it makes it true. Need them to know that all we have to do is say the lie one time and even – in politics, politicians know it – if they say lie, and even if a week later somebody reveals that it is not true people still believe the lie.
D: How do we know, that is the question. I can go on and on and on, and I would like to. I would people do this about the grammar. We can talk about Koch’s postulate. We were also told, all of these deaths are one. Italy, people are dying, and they are dying of COVID. Wuhan, everybody starves with COVID, wait a minute. What else is going on. What else was there. What else happened in Wuhan? What else happened in Italy and the other causes. They claim numbers. They are so stuck to make us understand that narrative. We are programmed we have been brainwashed we have been taught to believe that narrative . That is what I am saying. That’s the rhetoric. The first way to learn, the first way to understand is to realise that we have been trained to buy into the rhetoric. We have to stop and go back into our logic ,which will lead us to grammar. When Andrew Kaufman and Thomas Cowen6 go back to the grammar it is a paradigm shift that is hard to buy. Even this guy he was a trained scientist, he goes to this step by step by step, and people go …hmmm… I only heard that one time and only from one guy, so it can’t be true because the rest of all these people can’t be wrong. I heard the other thing I am gonna put on my mask and I am gonna go away. Wait a minute people : the mask makes you worse. Psychologically, physiologically emotionally. Where did it come from? Did anybody ever asked where this science come from? Who are the people who support it ? Who are they ? What did they do? What is their business? That is the grammar that go back to the grammar. Who are they? Where did they come from? Who pays them? Were they wrong the last time? Did this guy predict this 5 years ago. Keep breathing, … They knew it 5 years ago and now it is coming true and now you can predict the business will stop, wait a minute. Keep going back to the grammar. That is the big picture and there is a lot of part of it. We have to stop to go for what somebody says but we have a lot of work to do. We have to change the way how we process the information. We have to ask who are the people who is saying this. The mass media. And what else do they? They taking our rights away from saying things. If you put something on Youtube that WHO doesn’t like it they take it away. If you say anything what goes against the narrative the people that told you that high fat goes to .heart disease, they take your freedom away . If somebody takes your freedom away, what do you think about that? We have to stop right there. If they gonna take your freedom away, they don’t want me to know something.
Now, I have spent so many times, making so many mistakes listen to so much stuff. Now, they gonna take my freedom away. I am gonna say: Now, I am gonna take our heads off.
S: Maybe you know the study that people believe the other people who are wrong because they are afraid of social isolation.
D: Yes, exactly we are so manipulated. We have to go back to the root and understand what the word “conspiracy” means. That is what we need to do. We have to understand words like “anarchy”. I am just taking these two hot words they are so manipulated. Who is that person? That is the logical fallacy called “ad hominem”. There was a guy Eldon Chandler, and he wrote a spectacular book, he talked about this stuff, it is gonna be so hard for most people, but he already showed it but the marketing which goes on the billboards and on TV It is so satanic it so deep and these PhDs know how to hide the images which seem like pretty little things. And the second hand is what to do about it. We need to know that we are brainwashed all the time. You know again, I never answer your first question, and I am not gonna answer because anybody can keep off back to the trivium.
D: What about experienced journalist writing about virology, viruses and this? They know more than most virologist maybe more than any virologist. They interview people they do virology. Virologist says: Why are you asking me, you know more than I know. But I am gonna get the paycheck. You can read this stuff. And they explain this stuff very clearly. They know what is going on. We have to seek this out.
How do we know that this person, not that person? Again, I have been doing all this work for forty years, so when somebody writes crazy things. Then I go ok, let’s just see. But it takes time, and I found information and I listen again, and some people can’t even go close, and they are wrong. And they want more data comes out. They just know that s wrong. Almost right, but actually whatever. Listen to a bad idea. He is gathering data he is asking as many people as many as you can, he is throwing stuff out which is pointing to the right direction, the vector of this information Is going into the place that I wanna stay with not going to believe anything he said. But I am gonna listen to everything that he said, and I am gonna think about it. Now, two people, one is the medical doctor who decided to be healthy and quit poison people and the other guys who are the investigating journalist. They say the same kind of things, now let’s listen to this. We may say two parts this whole big picture I am gonna see how these part go gonna together. I am gonna stay with grammar. I am gonna do let them the hard work. Let Sheri Tenpenny she spent 40 000 hours of research wanting to know at the beginning why vaccines are safe and healthy, and she could not find it. She is in the big crowd. The united stated government puts out four billion dollars a year, and they tell us that vaccines are safe, but this part is to get a payment we have to go to seven years torture to get the government to pay, and 1 per cent of vaccine injuries are reported. But do the math on that. What is one per cent if there are 1 billion dollars, and there is only 1 per cent of the vaccine damage. Think about how much money they would actually pay for all the people. And this is the stuff that we know who is true. These are facts that you can go into getting the actual documents. It is not gibberish. It is not a hidden freak conspiracy. These are the fact that you can find on yourself. You have to know because it is hidden, but you can do it. So, you find a manipulator which shows that they do healthy things and there is an investigating journalist he has been for four years showing people, and that is the documents in there, and I have got another person and then is more just keep it standing out. That is how you learn. You have to do your own personal work.
S: Sheri Tenpenny talked about vaccines they didn’t have the double-blinded tested. And the testing for new vaccines is tested only for a few people and maybe more than half got better, and it is hard to claim any results.
D: Actually, it is easy if you go back to grammar. If they haven’t taken this website down go to John Bergman7 youtube vaccine and all that we have to do is watch the person for five minutes. He is gonna go hold you. We are still going into logic and rhetoric. What is the basic, basic, basic of the part of inoculation? Go back to the basic. The first thing what is actually in the vaccine?
S: That is what I don’t understand if you have a vaccine against bacteria, you get the killed bacterias or if it should be the vaccine against the virus. And the virus is not alive. How could you kill something which is not alive? What is this vaccine about?
D: You are still going to the rhetoric we have to go back to the grammar. You need to go to more fundamental. Go back and ask a deeper and specific question. WHAT IS IN THE VACCINE?
S: The matter which is basically the disease on its own.
D: And? And what else is there? What are those things?
S: I have no idea, it depends on the vaccine. I have heard the videos and Sheri Tenpenny said that there is aluminium, but I have no idea why is this matter there. Is it supposed to kill the virus, which is not alive how you can kill it? It is the thing which is not usually said in the videos, yes but she said it is aluminium. Is it the matter which can change the RNA of the virus or why is it there?
D: So the first part is, they put the poison in the vaccines, they call them adjuvants and they tell their employees to the drug companies make this vaccine. They put the poison in there, and they hire people to tell the rest of us, people hire, they tell them that the adjuvant actually stimulates the immune system. Now, where is the grammar here? Does it actually do what they say? And then we have to go to the medical school immunology, just how the immune system works before .. not medical, not highly advanced, just very basic way the immune system works in immunology. And it doesn’t satisfy the criteria on how the immune system works. And so why from the beginning. They are training these people. Go to medical school and these doctors they have so much stuff to learn, they just memorise, spit it out, memorise, spit it out, and they get out actually neurotic. There are a few doctors they don’t do that, they keep asking questions. There is a guy Burt Berkson8 he is a smart guy and he kept asking doctors questions but they said. Look, quit asking questions just memorise what we tell you that is the way which we are educated now. Memorise what we tell you, you are gonna be fine. Just do what are saying you make a lot of money. And he could not do that, and he got a PhD in mycology, studying mushrooms. But now he goes back as he wanna be a doctor and he becomes a medical doctor and didn’t ask them questions
18:36:16
D: because he knows the answer he just passes tests and gets a doctor. Now, he goes to somebody comes in and he had eaten poisoned mushrooms, and they have little poison they gonna die. So, the doctor who was ahead of the hospital said, I am gonna give you these people. Just give them as much pain medication to get them comfortable and they are gonna die and there is nothing what we can do about it. Well, he took a Hippocratic seriously, and he decided to do some research since he was a mycologist he studied mushrooms the mushrooms are the things that the people ate and damaged the liver, so he knew much about liver and mushrooms. So he read this study about alpha lipoic acid and it is true that it sparkles liver. So, he ordinated them this alpha-lipoic acid and these people live. So now his supervisor is furious. What you gave them it had nothing to do it, sometimes it just happens but doesn’t do it again. Don’t ever do it again, just follow my rules. So, he goes on, and a couple of weeks later, some people came in with liver damage again, and they were supposed to die. His supervisor says, just do what I tell you don’t do anything else, just do what I tell you and let them die. So, he said, yes, but he took a Hippocratic seriously, so he gave them some alpha-lipoic acid because he had some and they are there. So, now he goes what else is good for us. So, he decided to educate himself in the beginning, and he started giving people they are dying alpha-lipoic acid. Ok, maybe when it helps people from mushroom poisoning, maybe it helps for other liver things, so they start to give it to people who needed a liver transplant to have no chance to survive, and they survived. And then the hospital administration head of the hospital and those guys: listen, you better stop it because you have cost the hospital a lot of money and we are gonna ruin your carrier if you don’t. So, you see, that is what we are doing yet. We are not going back to grammar. We are assuming. There are too many assumptions. His head guy assumed that he had known everything about liver damage. The doctors are assuming that their treatment actually works the way they talk, but it doesn’t, and actually, it poisons people. It is up to the brain through the gut we know the mechanism. There is a medical doctor who showed the mechanism he is a gastroenterologist, Oxford-trained he showed the method of how vaccines cause autism because of the blood-brain relationship. Aluminium and mercury go get from the blood to the brain, and they cause autism. Wiliam Thompson9 admitted it in 2014 that they did studies and they knew that is possible.
If you want to know anything about vaccines, go to the grammar, what is aluminium, that is the poison. That doesn’t stimulate the immune system in a natural way. It doesn’t make any sense. Vaccinate the children they don’t even have a strong immune system you are just gonna crash it. It is like if you put weights on the baby. That is the grammar, that is the actual fact. That many many people keep saying.
Doctors are trained to believe what they were told. And if they are not doing what they are trained to do, they lose their job or their license.
D: There are doctors who are saying: wait a minute, stop. And licenses of those were taken away they can’t get on social media they can’t get on tv, so you see again how do we know. If a doctor has science for years forty thousand hours of research, how can there not every TV program, that is really obvious? Why wouldn’t we listen to the doctors who are on tv and don’t listen to the ones that go back to the very basic and have thought?
S: I would like to know if you don’t see anything from them, maybe just TV shows, don’t see these people like interesting enough to give them the slot in their programme. If they aren’t often published scientists, they can be easily overseen by media.
D: If you have a news program or program, that has commercials who pays for the commercials? Companies, they sell drugs, they sell vaccines. They don’t want to tell the people facts about what they know it is wrong
D: And you know there is the thing: people still have the TV on, they still read the newspapers they still have the radio they hear stuff. It is a great, great joke. In the United States, they advertise drugs, and they talk fast about the fifty side effects and people still listen to the TV, they still believe it. It is the truth. Because people keep going back to the same source. What information even though we know the line. I get people to say that all the time. Doctors say that, and they prescribe it. The doctor told me to take it. But the doctor came to me prescribe it. That is the poison, he can prescribe anything. I knew the guy who knew that the drug is .. but he took the medication anyway. It is gonna from the church, just follow this. Take this prescription. We are gonna check it out before we put it into the mouth. We were so brainwashed. It is not what we think it is how we think. Where is the information come from? And we are gonna go back to the places where people give us poor information. They are founded by drug companies. They go over and over and over put in this bias; no one is going to kill people. They still go to the same source.
S: You are talking about commercial TVs, but you still have a public tv.
D: In the United States, if you just go to the trivium, what is the facts? Who is the head of the FDA, which is the government branch that regulates all of the drugs? Who is the head of that? And who has been the head for last let’s say fifty years? They get the money from drug companies and the state, and they get back and forth. They legalised some drugs which were ineffective, and they gave FDA million dollars bonuses. These are things when any person can look at and just see that now. That is the grammar, but the logic is, and then these drugs are passed only logical they got the bonus, they can prove that. But there is the narrative which supports that. Drug company… logical we would say, drug company and government go together. We call it fascism. That is the definition of fascism. That is a fact. That is the grammar. When the government and the big business are part of the same thing, that s fascism.
We were told that the United States is the democracy what we can show that it is an actual fascist government. What is the difference between the republic democracy a socialist government and fascism? This is grammar. We kind of going on and on. That is an important story too. The difference between the republic and democracy is a giant difference.
S: Do you have any suggestion or imagination on how to change the situation for better?
D: Excellent question. I am gonna say that What can be done is absolutely being done. People like Andrew Kaufmann and Thomas Cowen and John Bergman and Sheri Tenpenny were being banned, but people want to know because now that we got hood away and we have to be socially isolated. People just have given up feeling I am a good person I do what I say. It feels right. Now, people learn to listen. There are other platforms they are opening up. So, what is happening is that people are speaking out, people business people, doctors are speaking out. They finally just say look, I can’t do this anymore. It s just people like you and me it’s just people talking. And say it is not true how am I gonna believe that? And we can get to say the word out how did it happen. What is that word mean? Do you know that it means completely different what you taught? Wait a minute, how do I get that? That is how it is gonna change. It is changing
S: That is good news we are making the change. It sounds optimistic.
D: There is still work that has to be done. But doctors, finally doctor Robert10 Roan has been doing ozone therapy for years, and finally people saying what is that?
Everybody heals on ozone therapy. Now, listen, here is grammar.
You can let me look at your files.? And you have every single person who came into your office? That have the symptoms and makeup better? You can tell me that you can go to Richard Massey’s office who was a medic in the army and he came into pharmacy school became pharmacologist, and then he went to the medical school and then he came in anesthesiologists and let me decided to heal people. That is an educated god. You can let me go to his office and look at his files, and I can see that people have these symptoms which were really really bad I can call them up, and they are alive, 100 per cent of those people? You can tell me that I can go to doctor Steven Smith, who worked in the hospital. In New York and he has been treating people with hydroxychloroquine, and 100 per cent of his patients are alive? And I can make you a long list because people are saying I am not gonna do what I was trained to do. I am gonna start helping people. There are people like that every day.
S: I wanna make sure that this real cure.
D: The words coming to our culture and are monocular, and they have a lot of power. The word corona comes from the word crown and also from the word coronary. And the word crown means twisted when they look at the arteries in the heart they were twisted looked like a crown. This is a coronavirus, so that is the same group of words we get coronary which are the base that makes blood at 22 days the heartbeats when we are an embryo, we have eggs, and we have sperm, and we’re starting to be a human in 22 days the heartbeats. And in numerology, you can add zero, and it means power and you get 2020 and let it be right now. The cosmic heart the power of the humans it has started to beat.
Links:
1. Koch’s postulates https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch%27s_postulates
2. Ancel Keys, Seven Countries Study https://www.sevencountriesstudy.com/about-the-study/investigators/ancel-keys/
3. Molecules of Emotion, Candace Pert https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/review-of-molecules-of-emotion-157256854/
4. Hegelian dialectic https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel-dialectics/
5. Elisabeth Rauscher https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Rauscher
6. Andrew Kaufman and Thomas Cowen https://www.bitchute.com/video/DZGV2eV9Ja0U/
7. John Bergman https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSS5Z1T6xuY
8. Burt Berkson https://isom.ca/profile/burt-berkson/
9. Wiliam Thompson https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033
10. Robert Roan https://www.oxidationtech.com/blog/tag/ozone-ebola/